Comparative analysis of WN and PM methodologies: Figure (a) displays the bar chart comparing WN and PM across five distinct concept sets (Methods), highlighting the number of concept sets where the cluster mean distance is significantly lower, indicative of superior embeddings., 2025. . 1 Januar 2025.
Elsevier - Harvard (with titles)Comparative analysis of WN and PM methodologies: Figure (a) displays the bar chart comparing WN and PM across five distinct concept sets (Methods), highlighting the number of concept sets where the cluster mean distance is significantly lower, indicative of superior embeddings., 2025. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0322498.g006
American Psychological Association 7th editionComparative analysis of WN and PM methodologies: Figure (a) displays the bar chart comparing WN and PM across five distinct concept sets (Methods), highlighting the number of concept sets where the cluster mean distance is significantly lower, indicative of superior embeddings. (2025). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0322498.g006
Springer - Basic (author-date)(2025) Comparative analysis of WN and PM methodologies: Figure (a) displays the bar chart comparing WN and PM across five distinct concept sets (Methods), highlighting the number of concept sets where the cluster mean distance is significantly lower, indicative of superior embeddings.
Juristische Zitierweise (Stüber) (Deutsch), Comparative analysis of WN and PM methodologies: Figure (a) displays the bar chart comparing WN and PM across five distinct concept sets (Methods), highlighting the number of concept sets where the cluster mean distance is significantly lower, indicative of superior embeddings., 2025, .