Treffer: Comparative analysis of WN and PM methodologies: Figure (a) displays the bar chart comparing WN and PM across five distinct concept sets (Methods), highlighting the number of concept sets where the cluster mean distance is significantly lower, indicative of superior embeddings.

Title:
Comparative analysis of WN and PM methodologies: Figure (a) displays the bar chart comparing WN and PM across five distinct concept sets (Methods), highlighting the number of concept sets where the cluster mean distance is significantly lower, indicative of superior embeddings.
Publication Year:
2025
Document Type:
Bild still image
Language:
unknown
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0322498.g006
Rights:
CC BY 4.0
Accession Number:
edsbas.6586C4E
Database:
BASE

Weitere Informationen

‘Significant’ designates those with a statistically significant difference in cluster mean distances , while ‘All Comparisons’ encompasses the entire dataset. Figure (b) illustrates the spread of mean distances within the PID Gene Sets, detailing the variance and central tendency across 194 gene sets. ‘Significant’ encompasses gene sets with notable mean distance variations between ‘PM’ and ‘WN’ , and ‘All comparisons’ includes all evaluated gene sets.