Treffer: Differences in compartment weights explain differences between EEG and ECoG.
Title:
Differences in compartment weights explain differences between EEG and ECoG.
Authors:
Publication Year:
2025
Subject Terms:
Biophysics, Cell Biology, Genetics, Neuroscience, Physiology, Biotechnology, Evolutionary Biology, Developmental Biology, Cancer, Space Science, Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified, Mathematical Sciences not elsewhere classified, Chemical Sciences not elsewhere classified, Information Systems not elsewhere classified, standalone python code, sonata data format, rat somatosensory cortex, new avenues open, network simulations accessible, coreneuron computation engine, computational neuroscience grows, complex tissue anatomy, permit online calculation, signal information content, e ., non, simulate eeg recordings, enable efficient calculation, div >< p, dipolar current sources
Document Type:
Bild
still image
Language:
unknown
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013023.g004
Availability:
Rights:
CC BY 4.0
Accession Number:
edsbas.2B955BAA
Database:
BASE
Weitere Informationen
A–B: Weights for EEG and ECoG recordings, respectively, calculated using the reciprocity approach, for a sample of L5 pyramidal cells in the forelimb (compartments represented as circles), hindlimb (compartments represented as triangles, enclosed in pink box) and upper lip (compartments represented as squares, enclosed in red box) regions. Electrodes are represented as red circles. Note the varying color scale ranges. C–E: Histogram of compartment weights for EEG recording, for L5 pyramidal cells in the forelimb, hindlimb, and upper lip regions, respectively. Dashed lines indicate mean values. F–H: Same as C–E, but for ECoG recording. Note that the x-axis range is different in each figure column.