Treffer: Satisfaction With Internet Access, Cancer Information-Seeking, and Digital Health Technology: Cross-Sectional Survey Assessment.
Original Publication: [Pittsburgh, PA? : s.n., 1999-
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2023 May 4;2023(61):133-139. (PMID: 37139972)
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 9;26:e56699. (PMID: 39652868)
Clin Cancer Res. 2021 Feb 15;27(4):933-936. (PMID: 33229457)
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024 Mar 7;116(3):476-484. (PMID: 37930884)
J Am Board Fam Med. 2020 Nov-Dec;33(6):953-968. (PMID: 33219074)
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022 Jul 11;114(7):940-952. (PMID: 35148389)
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Mar 06;33:100777. (PMID: 33733077)
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Nov 1;179(11):1580-1582. (PMID: 31355849)
J Med Internet Res. 2024 May 23;26:e50205. (PMID: 38780994)
Prim Care. 2022 Dec;49(4):517-530. (PMID: 36357058)
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Nov 22;15(23):. (PMID: 38067225)
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Aug 1;25(8):1080-1088. (PMID: 29788380)
JCO Oncol Pract. 2020 Jul;16(7):409-413. (PMID: 32574130)
J Rural Health. 2023 Jan;39(1):55-60. (PMID: 35817579)
J Med Syst. 2021 Jan 15;45(2):24. (PMID: 33452625)
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Jul;38(Suppl 3):832-840. (PMID: 37340258)
J Cancer Surviv. 2020 Oct;14(5):643-652. (PMID: 32390103)
JCO Glob Oncol. 2021 Feb;7:162-172. (PMID: 33529077)
Am J Surg. 2022 Apr;223(4):722-728. (PMID: 34384588)
J Palliat Care. 2018 Apr;33(2):79-87. (PMID: 29514545)
Telecomm Policy. 2020 Nov;44(10):102028. (PMID: 32863541)
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 14;23(6):e26242. (PMID: 34125071)
JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 Jan;17(1):e11-e15. (PMID: 33434450)
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Dec 16;9(12):. (PMID: 34946466)
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Mar 30;18(3):e73. (PMID: 27030105)
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jun 24;21(6):e13300. (PMID: 31237238)
J Law Med Ethics. 2019 Jun;47(2_suppl):39-42. (PMID: 31298126)
Health Promot Pract. 2021 Sep;22(5):605-610. (PMID: 33955266)
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Apr 12;24(4):e29492. (PMID: 35412457)
J Appl Gerontol. 2022 Mar;41(3):600-609. (PMID: 34608821)
J Cancer Surviv. 2022 Feb;16(1):44-51. (PMID: 34800257)
J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 10;23(5):e22549. (PMID: 33970111)
J Appalach Health. 2020 Jul 19;2(3):74-116. (PMID: 35770205)
Am J Public Health. 2020 Aug;110(8):1123-1125. (PMID: 32639914)
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):376-84. (PMID: 23381531)
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Oct 1;6(10):1531-1532. (PMID: 32789508)
Weitere Informationen
Background: Access to high-quality internet plays an increasingly important role in supporting care delivery and health information access. Although internet access has the potential to alleviate some inequities in health care, the digital divide negatively impacts cancer across the continuum. While subscription to high-speed internet has been previously assessed, satisfaction with home internet to meet the health needs of users is a lesser-known, important indicator of satisfactory access to internet-based health information and digital health technology use.
Objective: This study aimed to assess differences in perceptions of quality of at-home internet connection and its association to cancer health information-seeking experiences and use of digital health technologies in a nationally representative sample of US adults.
Methods: Secondary analysis of data from the National Cancer Institute's Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) 2022 (n=6252) was conducted. The primary predictor, "how satisfied are you with your Internet connection at home to meet health-related needs?," a novel item on HINTS 6, was dichotomized into "high" (extremely satisfied or very satisfied) and "low" (somewhat satisfied, not very satisfied, or not at all satisfied) satisfaction. Outcomes variables included 3 items assessing cancer information-seeking experiences and 2 items measuring access to telehealth and patient portals over the past 12 months. Adjusted logistic regression models (P<.05) were performed, including age, race and ethnicity, education, income, health insurance access, geography, and difficulty understanding cancer information, a proxy for health literacy, as covariates.
Results: Those reporting low satisfaction with their home internet had higher odds of agreeing that searching for cancer information took a lot of effort (odds ratio [OR] 1.59, 95% CI 1.16-2.19) and that they felt frustrated searching for cancer information (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.07-1.98). Respondents with lower satisfaction with their home internet had lower odds of accessing their patient portal at least once in the past year (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.33-0.89). While the relationship between internet satisfaction and concern over information quality was not significant, respondents aged 18-34 years reported higher odds to be concerned compared with those aged 75 years and older (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.04-2.90), and those with lower education reported less concern over the quality of information compared with those with postbaccalaureate degrees (high school graduate: OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.31-0.99; college graduate: OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.48-0.95). Finally, while the association between satisfaction with internet and telehealth use over the past 12 months was not significant, those without health insurance were significantly less likely to have had a telehealth appointment in the last year (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.19-0.81).
Conclusions: Satisfaction with internet at home to meet health needs is correlated with cancer information-seeking experiences and usage of some available health technology. These findings underscore the value of high-quality internet services toward successful implementation of health care technology and better patient experiences in health information seeking.
(© Maria Andrea Rincon, Richard P Moser, Kelly D Blake. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org).)