Treffer: A More Efficient Dynamic Programming Algorithm for Designing a Coding Sequence by Jointly Optimizing Its Structural Stability and Codon Usage.

Title:
A More Efficient Dynamic Programming Algorithm for Designing a Coding Sequence by Jointly Optimizing Its Structural Stability and Codon Usage.
Authors:
Source:
IEEE transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics [IEEE Trans Comput Biol Bioinform] 2025 Nov-Dec; Vol. 22 (6), pp. 2619-2629.
Publication Type:
Journal Article
Language:
English
Journal Info:
Publisher: IEEE Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 9919068173606676 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2998-4165 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 29984165 NLM ISO Abbreviation: IEEE Trans Comput Biol Bioinform Subsets: MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s):
Original Publication: [New York, New York] : IEEE, [2025]-
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20250814 Date Completed: 20251210 Latest Revision: 20251211
Update Code:
20251211
DOI:
10.1109/TCBBIO.2025.3596771
PMID:
40811180
Database:
MEDLINE

Weitere Informationen

Currently, a dynamic programming (DP) algorithm CDSfold has been proposed to design a CDS by minimizing the minimum free energy (MFE) of its secondary structure. However, it has been questioned recently that such a DP algorithm is difficult to be modified to design a CDS when attempting to jointly optimize its secondary structure stability and codon adaptation index (CAI). In this study, we successfully modify the DP algorithm of CDSfold to exactly solve this kind of CDS design problem in $\mathcal {O}(L^{3})$ time and $\mathcal {O}(L^{2})$ space, where $L$ is the CDS length. We further accelerate this DP algorithm by beam search, enabling it to design a high-quality approximate CDS in $\mathcal {O}(L)$ time, and implement it as the program LinearCDSfold. Our experimental results show that when running with exact search, LinearCDSfold has comparable accuracy to two state-of-the-art CDS design tools LinearDesign and DERNA in terms of both MFE and CAI. In terms of running time, however, LinearCDSfold is slower than LinearDesign, but significantly faster than DERNA, even though they all run in $\mathcal {O}(L^{3})$ time and $\mathcal {O}(L^{2})$ space. Moreover, LinearCDSfold using beam search can design an approximate CDS in very short time with very high quality in terms of both MFE and CAI.