ANDERSON, Cynthia und SCHUMACKER, Randall E., 2003. A Comparison of Five Robust Regression Methods With Ordinary Least Squares Regression: Relative Efficiency, Bias, and Test of the Null Hypothesis. Understanding Statistics. 1 April 2003. Vol. 2, no. 2, p. 79-103. DOI 10.1207/S15328031 US0202_01.
Elsevier - Harvard (with titles)Anderson, C., Schumacker, R.E., 2003. A Comparison of Five Robust Regression Methods With Ordinary Least Squares Regression: Relative Efficiency, Bias, and Test of the Null Hypothesis. Understanding Statistics 2, 79-103. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328031 US0202_01
American Psychological Association 7th editionAnderson, C., & Schumacker, R. E. (2003). A Comparison of Five Robust Regression Methods With Ordinary Least Squares Regression: Relative Efficiency, Bias, and Test of the Null Hypothesis. Understanding Statistics, 2(2), 79-103. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328031 US0202_01
Springer - Basic (author-date)Anderson C, Schumacker RE (2003) A Comparison of Five Robust Regression Methods With Ordinary Least Squares Regression: Relative Efficiency, Bias, and Test of the Null Hypothesis.. Understanding Statistics 2:79-103. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328031 US0202_01
Juristische Zitierweise (Stüber) (Deutsch)Anderson, Cynthia/ Schumacker, Randall E., A Comparison of Five Robust Regression Methods With Ordinary Least Squares Regression: Relative Efficiency, Bias, and Test of the Null Hypothesis., Understanding Statistics 2003, 79-103.